Saturday, September 15, 2012

Gay Marriage


In a society were quarrels are developed easily, one battle stands out, Gay Marriage.  The dominant parties, Republican and Democrat, have carefully delayed an official party platform until days before their respective conventions.  The Republican Party has stated they oppose not only gay marriage, but also any civil unions not between a man and a woman.  The Democrats have affirmed their support for legal marriage between people of the same sex.  The unique aspects of this disconnect are the respective reasons for why gays could either marry or not marry.  Both sides believe their opinion is valid, but based on the only legitimate body in our government, both sides are misguided.
A quintessential idea among conservatives is to preserve the framer’s desired form of government.  Although it is nearly impossible to derive the exact form of government they wished for without conjecture, the conservative party has deemed that our founding fathers believed marriage was between a man and a woman, exclusively.  The telescoping bias that this idea generates, only solidifies the invalidity of this perception.  If the framer’s believed that marriage was an issue in which the government can intervene, why did they not establish that in the constitution?  Many opponents to the conservative reasoning propose that this ideology is derived from the bible, where it clearly states that a man shall not love another man.  The bible is a legitimate method of governance to many people in the nation, but, the founding fathers did espouse numerous times that the government shall be free of any religious control.  Many conservative ideologists have stated that since congress has not amended the constitution,  and since the Supreme Court has not declared gay marriage constitutional, than marriage should remain between a man and woman.  This unique belief is sound, but it does not clearly explain why gay people cannot get married, it simply diverts the issue.
Many citizens believe that the gay community is being ostracized and dehumanized because of their sexual preference. To support their platform on gay marriage, liberal ideologues have stated that marriage is a right given to every citizen of this country.  The constitution does not explicitly state that marriage is a right granted to every citizen, therefore, the liberals have no legal evidence. Liberals often proclaim that our framer’s designed this country to ensure every man is created equal.  Unfortunately for the liberals, this idea was placed in the declaration of independence, a document that does not possess legitimacy among our government.  
This argument boils down to legal legitimacy.  There are only two ways in which gay marriage can be made constitutional, either the constitution is amended by congress and the states, or the Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage.  Although it is difficult to accurately predict what the framers believed, the authors of our constitution did insert a very powerful provision, the tenth amendment.  The tenth amendment accounts for the adaptation of our society to modern times, and diverts power to the states to decide what is constitutional and what is not, if it is not explicitly stated in the constitution.  The great duality of federalism allows for citizens of decide the outcome of this issue.  The only true constitutional way for this idea to be resolved is to leave it up to the state legislatures. 
Giving power to the states also promotes democracy.  Candidates can now ensure to voters their belief, and this will allow voters to select candidates who will vote the same way their constituency votes.  If a state population is in favor of gay marriage, it is the state’s duty to elect members of the legislature who will pronounce gay marriage legal.  Many states have already begun to litigate on this issue, but many are waiting for the federal government to issue a ruling.  Both arguments contain emotional legitimacy but no legal legitimacy.  It is difficult to discern which side is correct, many voters often decide based on instinct or previous experiences.  As society grows more progressive, gay marriage will gain enough supporters to be proclaimed constitutional, but the conservative coalition is a prominent force in today’s politics and shows no signs of being stymied.  This issue will continue to draw controversy until it is legally decided.




http://www.pdxqcenter.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/prop8signs.jpg